Remember the debate in an earlier blog about whether or not Belgian beers and glasses had co-evolved?
http://ecoevoevoeco.blogspot.com/2011/02/what-did-i-learn-today-lessons-from.html
And the subsequent follow up:
http://ecoevoevoeco.blogspot.com/2011/09/coevolution-of-beer-and-glasses-redux.html
The newest word comes from the champagne world, suggesting that drinks and glasses are not nicely co-evolved:
http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/litee/food/article_food/flute-or-coupe-maximising-the-champagne-experience/
And here is the paper:
http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0030628
Thanks to Shahin Muttalib for finding this.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Null Hypothesis is Always Wrong
No two populations are identical for any trait. No two communities have the same species composition. No detectable phenotype is ever compl...
-
As an editor, reviewer, supervisor, committee member, and colleague, I have read countless papers and proposals and have seen similarly co...
-
Body size has been a fascinating subject in science for quite some time. Why were some dinosaurs so big? Why are some organisms so small? Wh...
-
When I started my postdoc in 1998, I think it is safe to say that the Holy Grail (or maybe Rosetta Stone) for many evolutionary biologists w...
No comments:
Post a Comment