Remember the debate in an earlier blog about whether or not Belgian beers and glasses had co-evolved?
http://ecoevoevoeco.blogspot.com/2011/02/what-did-i-learn-today-lessons-from.html
And the subsequent follow up:
http://ecoevoevoeco.blogspot.com/2011/09/coevolution-of-beer-and-glasses-redux.html
The newest word comes from the champagne world, suggesting that drinks and glasses are not nicely co-evolved:
http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/litee/food/article_food/flute-or-coupe-maximising-the-champagne-experience/
And here is the paper:
http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0030628
Thanks to Shahin Muttalib for finding this.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A 25-year quest for the Holy Grail of evolutionary biology
When I started my postdoc in 1998, I think it is safe to say that the Holy Grail (or maybe Rosetta Stone) for many evolutionary biologists w...
-
As an editor, reviewer, supervisor, committee member, and colleague, I have read countless papers and proposals and have seen similarly co...
-
When I started my postdoc in 1998, I think it is safe to say that the Holy Grail (or maybe Rosetta Stone) for many evolutionary biologists w...
-
By Dan Bolnick This past month, The American Naturalist published what I hope is the final step in the Editorial Board's evaluation of w...
No comments:
Post a Comment