For the last couple of days, a large number
of ecologists and evolutionary biologists working in Quebec gathered to talk
about science, conservation and policymaking. This was the annual QCBS meeting
(Quebec Centre for Biodiversity Science). As usual, the meeting had lots of
young scientists eager to talk about research and potential collaborations – I
guess this is why the QCBS meeting always has a casual and friendly feeling.
There was no rush between sessions and the program was well organized. If you
missed a talk, you could always just approach the speaker during a coffee break
or over a beer (and you could also follow the entire conference via Twitter). Since
the meeting is fairly local – QCBS is only Quebec-wide – I was happily
surprised by the diversity of topics people work on, including invasive
species, community ecology, evolutionary biology, and landscape ecology.
One recurrent theme that I noticed was the
promotion of open science, including both open-access tools like R and Latex as
well as open-access data. Young scientists are more and more preoccupied with how
science is conducted and how it is promoted to the public. QCBS is at the
forefront of the movement to open up science, and this was obvious during the
meeting. One of the plenaries, “The open movement in biodiversity science:
tools and data sharing practices”, was given by three young researchers
(Geneviève Allard, Scott Chamberlain and Timothée Poisot). The talk was focused
on how data-sharing and open access tools could be used to make science more
transparent. If you think about it, nobody really replicates experiments
nowadays! How are we supposed to be confident in scientific findings if nobody bothers
to confirm the results of past studies? When I was an undergrad, I learned that
scientific advancement was achieved through replication and validation. But if
nobody does those things, how do we advance today? I don’t know the answer, but
perhaps open science is a good way to start, by at least allowing us to check each
other’s work more informally, and allowing the public more of a view on the
process . So go open!
The guest speaker: Prof. Ivette Perfecto |
Scott Chamberlain talking about open science and how to go open |
Our own Kiyoko Gotanda talking about how predictable is guppy evolution |
One final thing that I would like to say
about the QCBS meeting is that many of the students that were presenting their
work were recipients of QCBS grants that helped them with travel costs and
stipends. Since its establishment, QCBS has funded over 120 grad students (as well
as many undergrads and postdocs) to travel to conferences and workshops. As one
of those 120 recipients, I would like to say “thank you and keep the amazing
work!” This support really makes a difference in a graduate student’s career.
No comments:
Post a Comment