tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4456348657596914237.post2286724327156303668..comments2024-03-28T08:16:02.178-04:00Comments on Eco-Evo Evo-Eco: Dulling Occam’s razor - or the perilous principle of parsimonyBen Hallerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17875404974157070805noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4456348657596914237.post-3775168635935976002013-09-27T01:44:28.987-04:002013-09-27T01:44:28.987-04:00See Njal's response here: http://ecoevoevoeco....See Njal's response here: http://ecoevoevoeco.blogspot.ca/2013/09/normal-0-false-false-false.htmlAndrew Hendryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03653724437118653645noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4456348657596914237.post-71485955162269516572013-08-19T19:15:50.128-04:002013-08-19T19:15:50.128-04:00Nice post Andrew, with which I very much agree (ht...Nice post Andrew, with which I very much agree (http://dynamicecology.wordpress.com/2013/05/13/null-and-neutral-models-are-overrated/)<br /><br />Interesting to me as an ecologist to see an evolutionary biologist saying what you've said. From afar, I've always vaguely thought that evolutionary biologists were better than ecologists at developing and testing alternative process-based models that might have generated their data (e.g., models with vs. without selection). Perhaps that's just me seeing the grass as greener on the other side of the fence? <br /><br />-JeremyDr. Foxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02948439373673427525noreply@blogger.com